The sense-reference distinction in indian philosophy of language

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (3):331-355 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.1987.tb00346.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The sense-reference distinction in indian philosophy of language.Mark Siderits - 1986 - Synthese 69 (1):331-355.
Originalism and the sense-reference distinction.Christopher R. Green - 2006 - St. Louis U.L.J 50:555-628.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Sense, reference, and philosophy.Jerrold J. Katz - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Sense and reference: the origins and development of the distinction.Michael Kremer - 2012 - In Michael Potter, Joan Weiner, Warren Goldfarb, Peter Sullivan, Alex Oliver & Thomas Ricketts (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 220--292.
On doubting what there is not: The doctrine of doubt and the reference of terms in indian grammar, logic and philosophy of language. [REVIEW]Klaus Butzenberger - 1996 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 (4):363-406.
Meaning and Realism (in Hebrew).Gilead Bar Elli - forthcoming - Iyyun.
Toward a New Theory of Fregean Sense.Jungshin Suh Rhee - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Direct reference in thought and speech.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 26 (1):49-76.
Cohen's Criticism of Dummett.D. H. M. Brooks - 1976 - Analysis 36 (3):113 - 117.
Referential-semantic analysis: aspects of a theory of linguistic reference.Torben Thrane - 1980 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
h) Why Nyaya Remains Realist: Second Round Arindam Chakraborty Let us assume that Navya Nyaya cannot make the distinction between sense and reference. Why should that entail (as Daya.Why Nydya Remains Realist - 2004 - In Daya Krishna (ed.), Discussion and Debate in Indian Philosophy: Issues in Vedānta, Mīmāṁsā, and Nyāya. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
A strictly millian approach to the definition of the proper name.Richard Coates - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):433-444.
Irony and the dogma of force and sense.Stephen J. Barker & Mihaela Popa-Wyatt - 2015 - Analysis 75 (1):9-16.
Reference, Binding, and Presupposition: Three Perspectives on the Semantics of Proper Names.Emar Maier - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S2):313-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-02

Downloads
54 (#297,257)

6 months
11 (#244,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Siderits
Kyoto University

Citations of this work

Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language.Jonathan Stoltz - 2006 - Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 29 (2):383-400.
Sa-Skya Pandita’s Buddhist Argument For Linguistic Study.Jonathan C. Gold - 2005 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 33 (2):151-184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references