Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language

Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 29 (2):383-400 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines one highly localized set of developments to the Buddhist doctrine of word meaning that was made by twelfth and thirteenth century Tibetan Buddhist epistemologists primarily schooled at gSaṅ phu Monastery in central Tibet. I will show how these thinkers developed the notion of a concept (don spyi) in order to explain how it is that words are capable of applying to real objects, and how concepts can be used to capture elements of word meaning extending beyond reference to real objects.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-17

Downloads
598 (#30,214)

6 months
90 (#53,795)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Stoltz
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

Citations of this work

Tibetan epistemology and philosophy of language.Pascale Hugon - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Tibetan epistemology and philosophy of language.Hugon Pascale - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.
Sakya pandita and the status of concepts.Jonathan Stoltz - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (4):567-582.
The sense-reference distinction in indian philosophy of language.Mark Siderits - 1987 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (3):331-355.

Add more references