En 2018, première véritable année de la présidence de Trump, il devint parfaitement clair que la relation transatlantique était entrée dans une phase de profond désaccord, suscitant quantités de témoignages et de commentaires pessimistes dans la presse anglo-américaine. A partir de ce constat, l’article reconsidère l’étude du « transatlantique » en tant qu’aire géographique. Il aborde la manière d’appréhender le temps (la périodisation), l’espace (l’échelle) et la discipline (la méthodologie) afin de remettre en question les hypothèses classiques et d’ouvrir de (...) nouvelles voies pour la recherche, la formation identitaire et l’engagement émancipateur. (shrink)

En 2018, première véritable année de la présidence de Trump, il devint parfaitement clair que la relation transatlantique était entrée dans une phase de profond désaccord, suscitant quantités de témoignages et de commentaires pessimistes dans la presse anglo-américaine. A partir de ce constat, l’article reconsidère l’étude du « transatlantique » en tant qu’aire géographique. Il aborde la manière d’appréhender le temps (la périodisation), l’espace (l’échelle) et la discipline (la méthodologie) afin de remettre en question les hypothèses classiques et d’ouvrir de (...) nouvelles voies pour la recherche, la formation identitaire et l’engagement émancipateur. (shrink)

In 2018, the first full year of the Trump presidency, it became abundantly clear that the transatlantic relationship had entered a period of intense discord, causing a series of pessimistic reports and commentary in the mainstream Anglo-American media. With this as the starting point, the article re-examines the study of the ‘transatlantic’ as a region. It engages with thinking of time (periodisation), space (scale), and discipline (methodology) in order to question standard assumptions and open up new avenues for research, identity-formation, (...) and emancipatory commitment. (shrink)

Carnes Lord is an eminent Aristotelian scholar who has since the mid-1970s intermittently occupied positions within the United States government. This article considers the linkages between his writings on Aristotle and the standpoints he has adopted when in government, with particular reference to the period in the early 1980s when he fulfilled an important role in developing a public diplomacy and information strategy against the Soviet Union. Attention is given to Lord’s interpretation and application, in both his writings and his (...) policy-making, of several key aspects of Aristotle’s political thought, such as rhetoric, regimes, and education. The influence of Leo Strauss on Lord’s thinking is also taken into account. (shrink)

Over the past decade, John Krige has positioned himself as one of the foremost scholars investigating the seemingly simple yet, in truth, incredibly intricate and complicated issue of how and why k...