America has become a spiritual wasteland. Three aspects of the human condition are crucial for human beings to recognize if they are to develop a proper identity and agency within the world: these aspects are finitude, contingency, and the spiritual . The notion of the spiritual can be filled out with an understanding of faith. American culture is antithetical to faith, as is demonstrated through a discussion of the basic human practice of conversation. In America, conversation works against faith because (...) conversation has become brutal. Contemporary debate literally works against faith because conversation has become brutal. Contemporary debate literally works to annihilate the reality of others. These reflections support the conclusion that brutality is the antithesis of faithfulness. (shrink)

This essay begins by demonstrating how conversations can end before they have a chance to authentically begin. Conversations are stultified by patterns in the human ecology. The first pattern identified is “self-obliviousness” in conversation. “Self-obliviousness” is then tied to patterns of both radical self-assurance and self-diminishment. The underlying idea and argument is that adequate self-awareness is a necessary condition for conversation and this condition is only met as human beings recognize their own selves as relational. The argument then turns to (...) remedies to the pattern. Metacognition as exercised in relation to literary art can reveal the conditions for identifying and recognizing the damaging patterns. By the end of the essay the conditions for creativity in conversation are conflated with the formation of empathetic dispositions and these are only possible through understanding the self in equal relation to other selves. The arguments and examples are from contemporary United States Culture, but the damaging patterns can easily be recognized as elements of the human condition generally. (shrink)

This piece is a relatively long and critical discussion of two new books on the problem of evil: Susan Neiman's _Evil in Modern Thought (Princeton University Press, 2002) and _Rethinking Evil, edited by Maria Pia Lara (University of California Press, 2001). My focus in the essay concerns the ways in which Kant's understanding of evil are represented in both books. I especially focus on how Kant's understanding of evil can work as a way to explain evil in ways that Arendt's (...) thesis fails to explain evil. Even though I am often critical of the arguments in the books, I come to the conclusion that both books are excellent additions to the discussion of evil. (shrink)

The details of evil will sink any attempt at theodicy. But details of evil are usually- or even necessarily- lost in the abstract discussions of evil in philosophical texts. Hence this essay looks at the details of tragic fiction, specifically in some stories by Faulkner. The initial analysis endeavors to show that fiction gets us closer to the reality of agency than philosophy and so it then gets us closer to the reality of the evils that haunt both individuals and (...) cultures. Finally, the details of the evil analyzed reveal that human beings are actually capable of a self-destruction that annihilates the very grounds of human agency and identity: Faulkner’s tragic fiction reveals that self-destruction is written into the necessary components of agency and identity. (shrink)