4 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Kent L. Brintnall [3]Kent Brintnall [1]
  1.  22
    Queer studies and religion.Kent L. Brintnall - 2013 - Critical Research on Religion 1 (1):51-61.
    This article provides an introductory guide to queer scholarship in religious studies and theology. It also outlines approaches to queer studies and how they have been, and might be, appropriated in religious studies and theology. Finally, the article argues that greater clarity is needed when naming projects as “queer,” given that the terms “queer,” “queer theory,” and “queer studies” cover such a wide variety of approaches.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  3
    Negative ecstasies: Georges Bataille and the study of religion.Jeremy Biles & Kent Brintnall (eds.) - 2015 - New York: Fordham University Press.
    Negative Ecstasies discusses the contribution and significance of the work of Georges Bataille to the contemporary study of religion and theology, collecting essays that examine specific case studies and make connections to other significant scholars in the field.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  13
    Letters, Notes, & Comments.Kent L. Brintnall & Stephen S. Bush - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):545 - 555.
    This Comment argues that Stephen Bush's critique of Georges Bataille's meditative practice fails to recognize how the disruption of the self, and the challenge to goal-oriented activity that comprise the heart of that practice, serve as an ethical limit that protects against sadistic and violent engagement with the world. The ethical disposition fostered by Bataille's practice is a dissolution of the self. In this reply to Kent Brintnall's response to my essay on Georges Bataille and the ethics of ecstasy, I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  27
    Loss of self as ethical limit.Kent L. Brintnall - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):546-550.
    This Comment argues that Stephen Bush's critique of Georges Bataille's meditative practice fails to recognize how the disruption of the self, and the challenge to goal-oriented activity that comprise the heart of that practice, serve as an ethical limit that protects against sadistic and violent engagement with the world. The ethical disposition fostered by Bataille's practice is a dissolution of the self.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark